..these people use to subcontract job leads ..they would then go do the work..all this s*** they say are lies and or autobiography combos..simply third person admissions of their wrong doings..here's one for ya..2014 I spent Feb-Nov on crutches and in a cast..now how much of this could I have done..the scams were these a***oles actions....and Kevin Douglas..Im sorry U got lost in translation of simple math equations during our courses of simple addition.. No wonder u always thought u were getting cheated..u can't add or subtract..and one more thing to u all........April '14...wasn't that the last time U got fired for drug use...Kevin Douglas ?..u idiots reading this s***..don't u see its a hand full of sub contractors talking s***...Disgruntled thieves ..drug addicts..and thieves that are angry over the job abandonment they brought on themselves.."Terminated Techs "..say hey go to hell to Hans Johnson..Andrew..and all u liars and thieves..To the PUBLIC... Question: What are the elements of a defamation claim?
Answer: The party making a defamation claim (plaintiff) must ordinarily prove four elements:
1.a publication to one other than the person defamed;
2.a false statement of fact;
3.that is understood as
a. being of and concerning the plaintiff; and
 b. tending to harm the reputation of plaintiff.
4.If the plaintiff is a public figure, he or she must also prove actual malice.
Question: What are the elements of a defamation claim?
Answer: The party making a defamation claim (plaintiff) must ordinarily prove four elements:
1.a publication to one other than the person defamed;
2.a false statement of fact;
3.that is understood as
a. being of and concerning the plaintiff; and
 b. tending to harm the reputation of plaintiff.
4.If the plaintiff is a public figure, he or she must also prove actual malice.
Question: Can an opinion be defamatory?
Answer: No ? but merely labeling a statement as your "opinion" does not make it so. Courts look at whether a reasonable reader or listener could understand the statement as asserting a statement of verifiable fact. (A verifiable fact is one capable of being proven true or false.) This is determined in light of the context of the statement. A few courts have said that statements made in the context of an Internet bulletin board or chat room are highly likely to be opinions or hyperbole, but they do look at the remark in context to see if it's likely to be seen as a true, even if controversial, opinion ("I really hate George Lucas' new movie") rather than an assertion of fact dressed up as an opinion ("It's my opinion that Trinity is the hacker who broke into the IRS database
Question: What is libel?
Answer: Libel is a false statement of fact expressed in a fixed medium, usually writing but also a picture, sign, or electronic broadcast. See What are the elements of a defamation claim?
Question: What is libel per se?
Answer: When libel is clear on its face, without the need for any explanatory matter, it is called libel per se. The following are often found to be libelous per se:
 A statement that falsely:
? Charges any person with crime, or with having been indicted, convicted, or punished for crime;
? Imputes in him the present existence of an infectious, contagious, or loathsome disease;
? Tends directly to injure him in respect to his office, profession, trade or business, either by imputing to him general disqualification in those respects that the office or other occupation peculiarly requires, or by imputing something with reference to his office, profession, trade, or business that has a natural tendency to lessen its profits;
? Imputes to him impotence or a want of chastity.
Of course, context can still matter. If you respond to a post you don't like by beginning "Jane, you ignorant s**t," it may imply a want of chastity on Jane's part. But you have a good chance of convincing a court this was mere hyperbole and pop cultural reference, not a false statement of fact. Question: What is the "publication" of a defamatory statement?
Answer: Publication is the dissemination of the defamatory statement to any person other than the person about whom the statement is written or spoken. Question: May someone other than the person who originally made the defamatory statement be legally liable in defamation?
Answer: One who "publishes" a defamatory statement may be liable. However, 47 U.S.C. sec. 230 says that online service providers are not publishers of content posted by their users. Section 230 gives most ISPs and message board hosts the discretion to keep postings or delete them, whichever they prefer, in response to claims by others that a posting is defamatory or libelous. Most ISPs and message board hosts also post terms of service that give them the right to delete or not delete messages as they see fit and such terms have generally been held to be enforceable under law.
Question: What is Malice or "Actual Malice"?
Answer: Malice is often defined as, "the intent, without justification or excuse, to commit a wrongful act." It is the conscious, intentional wrongdoing with the intent of doing harm to do the victim. In many civil cases, a finding that a defendant acted with malice will often open the door to liability or increased damages, such as punitive damages. "Actual malice" is a legal term of art that is mainly relevant to defamaton claims. "Actual Malice" is found to be present when a false statement is published with either a) actual knowledge of its falsity or b) reckless disregard for its falsity-- a "should have known" standard. One cannot be held liable for publishing untrue statements about public figures (or companies) without being found to have acted with "actual malice"
Question: What is a "false light" claim?
Answer: Some states allow people to sue for damages that arise when others place them in a false light. Information presented in a "false light" is portrayed as factual, but creates a false impression about the plaintiff (i.e., a photograph of plaintiffs in an article about sexual abuse, because it creates the impression that the depicted persons are victims of sexual abuse). False light claims are subject to the constitutional protections discussed above.

Question: What is a SLAPP suit?
Answer: SLAPP stands for Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, or lawsuits aimed at squelching speech and involvement in government. Many states, including California, have anti-SLAPP statutes allowing one who has been targeted by a SLAPP to sue back.
Online, SLAPP suits typically involve a person who has posted anonymous criticisms of a corporation or public figure on the Internet. The target of the criticism then files a lawsuit so they can issue a subpoena to the Web site or Internet Service Provider (ISP) involved and thereby discover the identity of their anonymous critic. Many SLAPPers stop after discovering their critic's identity, using the tactic to intimidate or silence online speakers even though they were engaging in protected expression under the First Amendment.


Question: What are the elements of a defamation claim?
Answer: The party making a defamation claim (plaintiff) must ordinarily prove four elements:
1.a publication to one other than the person defamed;
2.a false statement of fact;
3.that is understood as
a. being of and concerning the plaintiff; and
 b. tending to harm the reputation of plaintiff.
4.If the plaintiff is a public figure, he or she must also prove actual malice.


Question: What are the privacy torts?
Answer: Much privacy law is state law, and may differ from state to state. As general categories, states may recognize interests in:

? unreasonable intrusion upon the seclusion of another;
? appropriation of the other's name or likeness;
? unreasonable publicity given to the other's private life; and
? publicity that unreasonably places the other in a false light before the public.
(from the Second Restatement of Torts, ? 652A) Question: Can I be sued for publishing somebody else's private facts?
Answer: Some jurisdictions allow lawsuits for the publication of private facts. In California, for example, the elements are (1) public disclosure; (2) of a private fact; (3) that is offensive to a reasonable person; and (4) which is not a legitimate matter of public concern. Publication on a blog would generally be considered public disclosure. However, if a private fact is deemed "newsworthy," it may be legal to print it even if it might be considered "offensive to a reasonable person."

Question: What is "intrusion into seclusion"?
Answer: Intrusion into seclusion occurs when you intrude upon the solitude or seclusion of another person or his private affairs or concerns, if the intrusion would be highly offensive to a reasonable person. It generally comes up in the context of paparazzi photographing celebrities, but covers any reasonable expectation of privacy that is intruded upon. If the person intruded upon gave you consent to do it - i.e., gave you permission to take his picture or write about him - then you have a defense against this claim. Interception of an electronic communication (i.e., an email or IM chat) can raise additional legal issues, such as federal wiretap laws.

Question: What is a statement of verifiable fact?
Answer: A statement of verifiable fact is a statement that conveys a provably false factual assertion, such as someone has committed murder or has cheated on his spouse. To illustrate this point, consider the following excerpt from a court (Vogel v. Felice) considering the alleged defamatory statement that plaintiffs were the top-ranking 'Dumb A***s' on defendant's list of "Top Ten Dumb A***s":

A statement that the plaintiff is a "Dumb A**," even first among "Dumb A***s," communicates no factual proposition susceptible of proof or refutation. It is true that "dumb" by itself can convey the relatively concrete meaning "lacking in intelligence." Even so, depending on context, it may convey a lack less of objectively assayable mental function than of such imponderable and debatable virtues as judgment or wisdom. Here defendant did not use "dumb" in isolation, but as part of the idiomatic phrase, "dumb a**." When applied to a whole human being, the term "a**" is a general expression of contempt essentially devoid of factual content. Adding the word "dumb" merely converts "contemptible person" to "contemptible fool." Plaintiffs were justifiably insulted by this epithet, but they failed entirely to show how it could be found to convey a provable factual proposition. ... If the meaning conveyed cannot by its nature be proved false, it cannot support a libel claim.
This California case also rejected a claim that the defendant linked the plaintiffs' names to certain web addresses with objectionable addresses (i.e. www.satan.com), noting "merely linking a plaintiff's name to the word "satan" conveys nothing more than the author's opinion that there is something devilish or evil about the plaintiff."

Question: What is cyberstalking?
Answer: It has been defined as the use of information and communications technology, particularly the Internet, by an individual or group of individuals, to harass another individual, group of individuals, or organization. The behavior includes false accusations, monitoring, the transmission of threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sexual purposes, and gathering information for harassment purposes. The harassment must be such that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.


The law of defamation balances two important, and sometimes competing, rights: the right to engage in free speech and the right to be free from untrue attacks on reputation. In practice, the filing or even the threat to file a lawsuit for defamation has sometimes been used as a tool to shut down legitimate comments on the Internet.
uestion: What is false light invasion of privacy?
Answer: "False light" is a claim that publicity invades a person's (plaintiff's) privacy by a false statement or representation that "places the plaintiff in a false light that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person."
Question: How does the First Amendment to the Constitution affect defamation?
Answer: The free speech guarantees under the Constitution protect certain speech and commentary. The degree of protection generally depends on whether the person commented about is a private or public figure and whether the statement is regarding a private or public matter. According to the New York Times rule (from the case New York Times v. Sullivan), when the plaintiff is a public figure and the matter is one of public concern, the plaintiff must prove "malice" or "reckless disregard" on the part of the defendant. If both parties are private individuals, there is less protection for the speech because the plaintiff only needs to prove negligence.

Question: What is disparagement?
Answer: As defined in Black's Law Dictionary (7th ed. 1999), disparagement is "A false and injurious statement that discredits or detracts from the reputation of another's property, product, or business. To recover in tort for disparagement, the plaintiff must prove that the statement caused a third party to take some action resulting in specific pecuniary loss to the plaintiff."

Wrong Jeff doesnt work with Kevin.  Kevin uses Jeffs name because he stole from KC.  In reallity its probably KC that stole from Jeff using KC's math.
Whats that you ask?
Well take all the numbers to be added together (unlabled eg electric.  Or office supplies)say what they are as fast as you can and throw in a few more numbers and this is this and thats this, whala and this is what you owe.
It doesnt go over well especially when you know that its not true.

So basically you have no response to my comment of anything regarding the subject.
Or has he thrown you to the side like its said on the blog spot thats out there.

HE'S NOT IN JAIL BECAUSE HE RUNS FROM EVERYTHING. HE WILLNOT STAND UP FOR WHAT HE HAS DONE. THE FACT THAT HE STILL DOES THIS IS EMBARRASSING FOR THE AMERICA CITIZEN.
HE SHOULD BE TREATED AS A TERRORIST
WITH A BOMB ON HIS CHEST.
OR PUT DOWN LIKE A LAME HORSE.

If he is not a scam artist why doesnt he call his complaints back?
Why does he always move his office from state to state?
Why doesnt the IRS have any business license or tax id number on him?
Last question why does he ruin your carpets and feels good about himself?
He has no conscience at all.
He got my check and ran and cashed it within 20 min of leaving my house.
So Janelle the one that lays down with him.
How do you feel now. Knowing that you are a woman that shares her bed with a con-artist.
Have you read "the necklace of charms" on his blog. Well maybe when you sober up you'll figure it out.
I can't wait for him to return to my area.
Big surprises will be waiting.

It looks to me like a hand full of people don't have a life and feel the need to fill they're spare time bashing Kevin!!   I know him and he's nothing about what you are trying to make everyone believe.  And it is my understanding that these so called nameless people who are complaining.. Are ex's of his trying to get revenge.  Telemarketing is what it is no matter what company. Tons of people have in manned offices.  Pretty common these days people!  He he's such a criminal why isn't he in jail them?

You say he ruined your carpets what happened please goto word press.com jeff harris kevin calvin the truth about are your carpets dirty. What area do you live in  he's been tracked to san diego and  surrounding areas.

I hope you do.  This con-artist took $460.00 from me and destroyed my carpets.  The advertisement comes out as "Are your carets dirty?"  We have a special of $9.95 per room, etc., etc.  I am reporting him to the police and have reported him to Channel 13. I am hoping to hear back from Channel 13.

He s started back up again got 3 calls last week and 1 just now.
The phone number now is 9162349398 and its rays carpet cleaning and goes by the name ray brown
I have read so much on this guy is sickening.ray brown
Kevin jay calvin.  I also heard he goes by jeff harris and kc and casey calvin
But all the information I have read on him say he s  kevin jay calvin and heard he s in San diego ca and he s calling my house in sacramento ca
Anybody heard or know of other areas that he s in now

don't worry,i'm going to set up an appointment and kick the living s*** out of whoever shows up

I too have been hounded by an automated recording from "Ray"... same identical speech as above. I've hung on the line and listened to the entire message and hit 2 to be taken off their list, I've talked with an operator and told them take me off, but the calls keep coming. Funny how NO ONE knows the name of the company they represent. So I set up an appointment. They came today and I asked them for a business card and then told them I'm tired of the calls. The guy went ballistic on me and told me I would regret wasting their time. As he drove off he told me he's going to make sure my number is on EVERY call list. The number on the card, 720-708-6474 is registered to TCE Marketing in Aurora, CO.

This jerk is a company that local carpet cleaners in your area are contracted with.  You call and he dispatches one in your area.  He gets around the DNC list because he uses Magic Jack or something similar that can't be tracked.   I have a mortgage company doing the same thing and the recording tells you to hit 3 if you don't want any more calls.  But what that does is that it sends an acknowlegdement that it's a good number....so they keep calling you.  I had an operator answer and told her that I wanted off their list and she just hung up on me.

Jeff Harris is a real person.  He is actually from Stuart Fl, and has pulled this carpet cleaning thing with Kevin Calvin for years.  This Kevin Calvin lives out of his car, and just travels to wherever he can set his phones up.


https://www.facebook.com/jeffrey.harris.92123?fref=ts

Jeff Harris is a real person.  Here is his FB page.  He works with Kevin Calvin
https://www.facebook.com/jeffrey.harris.92123?fref=ts
http://800notes.com/Phone.aspx/1-916-222-4456

If your phone number has been on the National Do Not Call List for over 30 days then you can report him at 1 (888) 382-1222.   You will need the date(s) of his call(s) and the number from which he called.

This A** is now operating in the Denver area.  Not only does he use a couple of different numbers, his caller id is now shown as ABC Marketing with a phone no. of 720 583-6935 as well as Tcemarketing 720 708 6499.  But the voice and message is the same.  What a sicko. Maybe calling the telephone company and reporting the harassing calls coming from this number will help.

I got the call, except the number is 720-708-6600
I'm on do Not Call

This is the second call after 8:30 pm I have received within a month. I listen to the message and press 9 to have my number removed. But - again tonight as I am putting my young child to bed, they call again with that stupid automated message about getting your carpets cleaned. I hate this company! It is so rude!

I received an unsolicited call from TCE Marketing for carpet cleaning this morning. I am also on the DNC list and have been for years. Clearly that does not matter to these scam artists.

The phone number that called me was 720-708-6367

He's BACK!!! Jeff Harris wants to clean my carpets. Telephone number of 720-708-6446.

the ring my phone constantly also from720-708-6461. icall them back & # goes directly to answer machine computer. help...

The address for TCE Marketing is 2300 Valley View Ln Ste 223 Irving, TX 75062
this office has phone equipment in it, but there are no people there. He may not be there for long as he can't pay his bills on time. he lives in ca. but is in the dfw area now and will move on to another state later once his phones and suite are taken away for none payment. Kevin Calvin may also be a fake name... Jeff Harris is not a real person. I would go to the FBI & also the FCC he is breaking every law in the book. and his tatics could be considered a federal offense.. He most likey has other offices that use the same tatics for set up. and runs them a few months at a time and then skips town and pays no one for the office suite and phone lines he buys he then does it all over again a few months later. if you live in dallas you can go to this location and wait till someone shows up to check on the equipment in that suite. no idea how often the suite is checked for service. This guy will burn everyone around him. My guess is he will set up lines using a false id, then run them for a few months until they are turned off for none payment and then do it all over again using the same mo fake Id's. the equipment in the office suite is the crown jewel.. he has to have that equipment to make all the phone calls... like a robo dialer.

I just checked TX driver's license records and there is no one here with the name Kevin Calvin.  I even ran his birthdate to see if there was someone with the same last name.  Nothing.  So, if he's here, he doesn't have a TX driver's license.  He only has 90 days to surrender his out of state license and get a TX license, and only 30 days to register his vehicle.  Active duty members of the U.S. Armed Forces and non-resident, full-time students attending a Texas college or university are the only ones who are exempt from the requirements to title or register their vehicles, but the driver's license law applies to everyone.....so he might be breaking those laws too!!!

I get calls too that are always recorded and the caller ID says TCE.  The number today was 972-887-3227.

Spoof Companies include:  spoofcard.com,  telespoof.com,  spooftel.com, phonegangster.com, bluffmycall.com, spoofapp.com,  freecalleridspoofing.com,  ETC.  ETC..   One can change their voice while making these calls as well.   Congress was going to shut them down but there's more serious problems right now.  You could always call some of them and ask about telemarketing.

Also, the phone companies can trace calls and will usually do it for free.  You just need to collect as much information as you can about the calls.   If you have cable, they also have departments to go after these people.  Call and complain, collect times, dates, phone numbers, everything you have.  Keep your head about you and get the info to as many places that might help as you can including Do Not Call List  complaints.

So have you called him and complained?   What happened?

I get these calls as well.  I left a message one time saying I was going to schedule a meeting and then beat the crap out of who ever showed up.   Then I started getting phone calls from TCE where there was no message, just back ground noise like a tv or radio then it would hang up after a bit.   So who knows.  There's even someone who needed their carpets cleaned and never heard from them???   Sounds suspiciously like a nasty prank.  Which is very illegal as well.   I will bet I'm not the only one that has made idle threats.  It's making someone happy,  the Sicko.  I called the TCE number and got mailbox like message to put in the number for the mailbox.  All automated.
Here is the latest phone number showing up for TCE:  972.887.3179
The message gives this phone number :   530.876.6238   for Jeff Harris as usual

Note:  There are companies called "Spoof Call" & "Spoof Tell"  I think.  Look up anything with the word Spoof in it and you will find these companies.   They spoof phone numbers for anyone willing to pay.

Makes sense - I got a call from him last night, via 972-887-3023.  This is an Irving TX phone number.

Interesting - last night at 10:20 pm, I got one of these calls. It was from an Irving, Texas phone number: 972-887-3023.  But when I checked this number it does not belong to a Jeff Harris or a business; it's a woman's personal line.  I think Jeff is fiddling with his outbound caller ID so that fake numbers show up.

THE GUYS NAME IS NOT JEFF HARRIS. HIS NAME IS KEVIN CALVIN. HIS ACTUAL NUMBER IS 530-388-0594. HE IS A SCAM ARTIST.