877-836-8586
Not-Impressed
Not-Impressed
2014-03-08 18:24:26
Unknown
Well this certainly sounds like a company I want to do business with!
info@venulum.com
info@venulum.com
2014-03-07 14:53:33
Unknown
Surely you can see that Venulum's lawyers missed a filing deadline, all this means is Venulum will sue their lawyers and recover their money? This is good news for Venulum clients.
info@venulum.com
info@venulum.com
2014-03-07 14:51:48
Unknown
what a load of nonsense, any client of Venulum's who has asked for the wine they purchased to be delivered has had the wine delivered. Childish baseless threats of intimidation from a Polish Dr pretending to be a gangster are pathetic. Pay your bills, honour your contract and we will not sue you, otherwise we will sue you for triple damages. We keep winning our lawsuits, Mr MacLeod our process server will find you to serve our damages award and we will bankrupt you if you do not pay. Don't for one minute think this over, we are coming after you for the lies you have told and the damage you have caused.
HGM
HGM
2014-01-29 09:21:16
Telemarketer
I recall dealings with  Ashley, Annette, Herb. I never really made any money with them. It smelled like a rotten egg from the  beginning. Boiler room operation. Shame on the people who were aware of the scams being had.
norman
norman
2014-01-24 20:33:00
Unknown
you are hgm
DrHook
DrHook
2013-12-30 17:55:10
Unknown
This is a comprehensive list of names, although I think some may be wrong. I had contact with a Rhys Myrdal, not Rice as you stated in your post. Not sure about the others though.
gotoutwhileicould
gotoutwhileicould
2013-12-29 05:03:16
Unknown
Way to go Dave - you're probably a doctor or a dentist - save your money. Fraudulent calls saying they have a "package" for you - just a con's way of getting you to agree to them sending a crappy brochure so they can legally call you afterward. Avoid like the plague - which is what they are - al lalchan, al Williams, mark, johnathan, giles - bunch of grifters who auta be kicked outa Canada
Delmonte
Delmonte
2013-12-21 16:53:28
Unknown
http://www.guernseylegalresources.gg/ccm/lega ... 3/GLR030098.htm

Paul Freeman, Graig Garrett, Sean Stockdale, Chris Els, Alun Williams, Philip Beesley worked for Ocean:

?My job was to call American investors. These people were all doctors and dentists. The system worked as follows. We had to persuade these people to invest $1,000 in wine contracts. Once these people had deposited $1,000, they would receive a contract note on which it appears that they had placed an order; that they had made a deposit of $1,000; and that there would be an unpaid balance, depending on the contract value. The unpaid balance was something we did not tell the investors about beforehand?they would find that out from the contract. We just told them that we advised them to invest in wines and that there would be a profit if we could sell the wines for them.
Delmonte
Delmonte
2013-12-21 16:45:38
Unknown
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCOURTS-tnw ... ent-detail.html

Paul Freeman, Ryan Ferreira and Daniel Bartlett all worked for Ocean, selling wine investments and they are still at it.
Heather
Heather
2013-12-07 00:47:08
Unknown
We heard Craig Garrett is bankrupted. Next stop Chris Els.
http://www.guernseylegalresources.gg/ccm/lega ... 3/GLR030098.htm

One by one they'll have to answer. Alun Williams.
Norman MacLeod
Norman MacLeod
2013-11-22 11:18:05
Unknown
More research on how malnourished Venulum is to invest

http://www.building.co.uk/amendments-to-the-c ... 5057792.article

Amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules: Venulum Property Investments Ltd vs Space Architecture Ltd & others
15 July 2013

PRINTEMAIL
MORE SHARING SERVICESSHARESHARE ON TWITTERSHARE ON FACEBOOKSHARE ON LINKEDIN
COMMENTSAVE
Related Articles

Legal brief: Westshield Civil Engineering vs Buckingham Group Contracting
10 Jul 13
Arrest at Laing O?Rourke and Costain?s joint venture
5 Jul 13
Adjudication: Beat the clock
1 Jul 13
Extension-of-time disputes
25 Jun 13
Building Act: A pier entrance can be deceptive
24 Jun 13
This judgement shows how amendments that came into effect from 1 April have allowed courts to adopt a less forgiving approach to delay and non-compliance with directions

Lisa Kingston
Background

During 2006 Venulum Property Investments Ltd (?Venulum?) exchanged contracts for the purchase of Enterprise Square in Northampton (?the Site?). The purchase price was £4.55 million.

Planning permission was granted for a development consisting of 155 residential units and 171 car parking spaces. Venulum completed the purchase on 22 December 2006.

In February 2007 Venulum realised that the supporting columns in the underground car park shown in the development design would not be capable of supporting the building. This resulted in the loss of around 30% of the parking spaces and Venulum contended the development was worth less than the purchase price.

Venulum waited until 2012 to instruct solicitors to commence proceedings to recover the substantial financial losses it claimed to have suffered. Venulum?s Claim Form was issued on 12 November 2012 but it was not served immediately. On 28 February 2013 Venulum sent a letter of claim under the

Professional Negligence Pre-Action Protocol to ten proposed defendants. The defendants included the architects who had prepared the design and a number of agents employed by Venulum in connection with the purchase. Venulum alleged its agents had acted in breach of their duty to ensureVenulum was properly advised.

Venulum?s Claim Form was served on 12 March 2013 being the very last day for service permitted by CPR 7.5(1) but Venulum?s solicitors failed to serve the Particulars of Claim at the same time contrary CPR 7.4(2) and 7.5(1). When the Particulars were served a few days later, the first eight defendants agreed to a short extension of time for service of the Particulars of Claim under CPR 3.1(2)(a) and 3.9 but the ninth and tenth defendants did not. Venulum therefore issued an application for an extension of time under CPR 3.1(2)(a) and 3.9. Absent an extension, Venulum?s claims against the ninth and tenth defendants would be time barred.

Venulum?s application for an extension was issued prior to 1 April 2013 but was heard on 22 May 2013. The criteria for granting relief from sanctions set out in the pre 1 April version of CPR 3.9(1) applied but it was agreed that the amendment to the overriding objective at CPR 1.1, coming into force on 1 April 2013 were also relevant to the Court?s consideration of Venulum?s application. The new sub-paragraph (f) to CPR 1.1 required the Court to enforce compliance with rules, practice directions and orders.

Venulum said that there had been no history of default and that it had not behaved improperly where the Particulars of Claim had been served late due to an error by their solicitors.

The ninth and tenth defendants claimed that there was no good explanation for the failure to serve the Particulars of Claim in time and asserted that from 1 April 2013 the Court was required to adopt a less tolerant approach to failures to comply with matters such as time limits.

Issue

Was Venulum entitled to an extension of time?

Decision

No. Looking at the circumstances as a whole, in particularly Venulum?s unexplained delay in commencing proceedings, and bearing in mind the stricter approach now being taken by the courts, the Court should not exercise its discretion to grant an extension of time.

Commentary

The amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules that came into effect from 1 April 2013 have allowed the courts to adopt a less forgiving approach to delay and non-compliance with directions.

Whilst Venulum?s application was not considered in light of the post 1 April 2013 amendments to CPR 3.9, it was still necessary to take into account the post 1 April 2013 amendments to the overriding objective. It should be noted that the new sub-paragraph (f) to CPR 1.1, requiring the courts to enforce compliance with rules, practice directions and orders, employs the same wording that appears in the new CPR 3.9(1)(b).

Venulum?s delay in bringing proceedings and not serving the Claim Form until the last possible moment was a compelling factor in the Judge?s reasoning. No explanation whatsoever had been offered for Venulum?s five-year delay in commencing proceedings. Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart made a general observation that a claimant who leaves it until the last minute to issue proceedings will be under a high obligation to ensure the claim presented is clear, coherent and properly particularised, especially if the claim involves allegations of bad faith.

This decision reflects the new stricter approach that the courts will adopt post 1 April 2013. In future there will be significantly less indulgence towards parties who unnecessarily or without good reason delay proceedings or fail to comply with directions or Court Rules.

Lisa Kingston
Fenwick Elliott LLP
Norman macleod
Norman macleod
2013-11-22 11:14:10
Unknown
mplications Implications
The judge said that when the circumstances were considered as a whole, particularly in light of the new stricter approach
that had now to be taken towards those who fail to comply with the rules, the application should be refused. The
claimants, he observed, had ??taken quite long enough to bring these proceedings and enough is now enough.? (para.
58).

Although there were other factors at large in this case, the judge?s specific reference to the amended provisions of the
overriding objective in CPR 1 and the new ?stricter approach? to be taken when dealing with rule breaches or failures,
provides an early insight into the new more robust and less tolerant approach which has been trumpeted as being a key
part of the civil litigation reforms that have been with us since 1 April. Weightmans, alone amongst the ten defendants,
opposed the claimants? application for leniency, and it is very encouraging to see that, in this case, the court was in
agreement, a clear indication that the judiciary is taking seriously its obligation not only to ensure that parties comply with
court rules and timescales but also demonstrating that those in default will not neccessarily get away with little more than a
slap on the wrist for their transgressions, as they may have done in the past.


For further information about Weightmans or to discuss any of the issues in this update, please contact Ed Lewis d Lewis d Lewis, Partner , Partner
on 020 7882 1992 on 020 7882 1992 or eeed.lewis@weightmans.com ed.lewis@weightmans.com

Weightmans LLP Weightmans LLP
Mayaaa 2013


Read more after the result ,

This update does not attempt to provide a full analysis of those matters with which it deals and is provided for general information purposes only. This
update is not intended to constitute legal advice and should not be treated as a substitute for legal advice. Weightmans accepts no responsibility for any loss,
which may arise from reliance on the information in this update. The copyright in this update is owned by Weightmans © 2013

Venulum legal failure
http://www.weightmans.com/pdf/Venulum.pdf  
http://www.weightmans.com/press/landmark_judgment_gives_first.aspx
Norman MacLeod
Norman MacLeod
2013-11-22 10:59:29
Unknown
yes I can, e mail me please mrnormmacleod@gmail.com

http://www.streetdirectory.com/businessfinder ... ranchid=1816681
416 673 2313
77 king st e, 77 king st M5C1G3
http://www.streetdirectory.com/canada/ontario ... 250/travel_no_/

Address of Executive Of?ces (Number and Street, City, State, Zip Code) ... (ifdifferent from Executive Of?ces) eio Venulum Capital Ltd., 77 King Street West, P.O.. Box 83, 3] st Floor, Royal Trust Tower, Suite 3105, Toronto, ON, Canada MSK IGS.

More fraud alledged
http://www.zenithchambers.co.uk/cms/document/Venulum_properties.pdf
Dr Fool
Dr Fool
2013-11-22 10:50:32
Unknown
yes I am not proud, but I opened 3 - 6 accounts each week under threat of fire if I missed 3 more than twice. I was there from 96 - early 98
Norman MacLeod
Norman MacLeod
2013-11-22 10:47:55
Unknown
Exactly Dr A.   there is wine, just useless.  I see finest Bordeaux selling in Canada for 80 tops, not the 150 - 200 claimed by the wine traders.
Norman Macleod
Norman Macleod
2013-11-22 10:45:52
Unknown
Lies I read from success stories are paid off clients, who complained of paid one hell of a lot of money and feel secure it is there.  Confident, post the positive news hard core truth.  Then I will believe you.
Norman MacLeod
Norman MacLeod
2013-11-22 10:43:05
Unknown
And what do you plan to do.  Why do you rob my G+, mrnormmacleod, or G+ user name Norman Macleod, Venulum?   You are now in Canadian law dealing with a Canadian.  I will start harassment complaint in the police division this Monday, November 25th.
Norman MacLeod
Norman MacLeod
2013-11-22 10:39:55
Unknown
I should be listed too for my actions in my late teens.........   HGM, Churchill Associate Management.  I apologize profusely.
Norman MacLeod
Norman MacLeod
2013-11-22 10:36:57
Unknown
Dr Glasserman, did I open your account, if so I am sorry about ocean, I was 19, off the streets, no feeling of association, given my experience.  I have grown my morals
Norman MacLeod
Norman MacLeod
2013-11-22 10:34:23
Unknown
My name is Norman MacLeod on here, stop taking my name and misrepresenting it or I will sue you here.  I have you tube investigating your unauthorized access to my film you altered, and mis represented Venulum.  I was sure Rome Bhmbra was too sick to be part in this......
norman macleod
norman macleod
2013-11-22 10:31:54
Unknown
That is interesting how this is playing out.  I believe the law suite was a fraud also........
Leslie V.
Leslie V.
2013-11-06 21:16:35
Unknown
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2012/lr22258.htm
Dr. Donovan
Dr. Donovan
2013-11-04 10:39:06
Unknown
Heros Global Markering, Architects of Wine, Seed. Ocean International Marketing. Daniel Bartlett. Giles Cadman, Mark Trotter. Churchill and Associates. Craig Garrett, Sean Stockdale. Denver Andersson. Sam Howard. Rice Myrdal. Dean McCarroll. Paul Freeman. Ernest Saunders. Rosemary Ault. David Wilcock. Anil Kohli. Rome Bahmra. Jadon Schmidt. Michael McKensy Smith. Shaun Gerard. Andrew Crossley. Warwick Freeman. Norman McLennan. Chris Els. Charles Duckworth. Nadya Isaac. Russell Beesley. Philip Beesley. Hari Kupper. Esther Van Hengel. Douglas Calder. Bob Middlemiss. Lance Terry. Anthony Duckworth. Ryan Ferreira. David Krijn. Karen Conolly.They should be listed together until investdrinks is up again.
Dr. Donovan
franklindonovan@aol.com
Ian Smith
Ian Smith
2013-10-23 03:06:04
Unknown
I have a piece of good news for Dr. Kosma and all other investors in Venulum wine securities. Gilles apparently  has not been not lucky enough and got in conflict with some Russian guys through his Venulum wine investments. I am not sure if you know what does it mean for him, his wonderful and helpful guys in Toronto, as well as his business in BVI.
Anyway Gilles, looking forward to read your wonderful blog and comments. Please let us know how are you doing..
Talk to you soon
Ian D Smith
HonIanDSmith@gmail.com
Dr Kosma
Dr Kosma
2013-10-22 23:44:02
Unknown
Just to add some sense of objectivity to the discussion.
This is results of the ruling on Venulum from South Carolina - it clearly states that Venulum was engaged in unethical activities, they should cease them and was fined $5.5. I believe that similar complains should be done in all US jurisdictions so at least this highly viral and fraudulent company will feel some pain.

http://2hsvz0l74ah31vgcm16peuy12tz.wpengine.n ... der.9.25.13.pdf
Concerned
Concerned
2013-09-21 15:49:12
Unknown
I can attest to the validity of Mr. MacLeod's statements and the accuracy therein. His accounts are facts.

I was witness to his being a 'Closer' in Toronto answering to his 'supervisor' Mark Trotter who works for Venulum.

Mr. MacLeod was sent to work at the Holland office alongside 'Portfolio Managers'.

Fake people, Fake office, Fake operation.

Doctors' names (lead sheets) were bought.
Doctors were solicited under false pretense. (they never requested to receive any info)
Doctors' names & contact info. was then shredded.

All employees were told to lie by management
All employees were lied to by management.
Some were insiders - privy to the scam.
Others were threatened.

There is proof - scripts used by Fronters, etc. pictures, audio recordings, written documents.
A list of names of all truly involved.
Many are guilty - few got blamed.

Who would want to deal with such type people.
Concerned
Concerned
2013-09-21 14:10:31
Unknown
Venulum is soliciting Americans from Canadian soil, despite being British.
ExSeeder
ExSeeder
2013-09-21 14:00:03
Unknown
No charges ever laid on Rome who was drunk driving claiming poor Ian lost his life.

This co. is lead by the scum residue of those people from those days.

btw - it's not lible or defamation if it's TRUE!

Sociopaths.
UpFronter
UpFronter
2013-09-21 12:50:36
Unknown
"You know that the comment is untrue and don't think you can hide behind US law, or spoofing your IP address, we have ways of tracing, finding and suing you."

This kind of threat from a reputable company? - what a joke!

Looks like the same juvenile folks running ponzi companies from the past.

Same crap - different name :(
AF
AF
2013-09-21 09:55:52
Unknown
http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/mark-trotter/1a/758/99a
1-209-220-4152 1-412-489-4878 1-130-033-2245
Call Type:
Comment:
Your name:
Validation:
© WHOSCALL.IN 2011-2024 - Privacy