773-712-9172
IL, US
| Abbey 2011-11-01 13:30:15 Unknown |
Just got a call from 901-290-1123 at work so answered. When told them the person they were asking for wasn't in they just hung up on me while I was talking!! That was the WRONG thing to do! I can't wait for them to call back.
| Annie 2011-07-22 20:53:55 Unknown |
The callback number I received was 504-432-6846 but the number on caller ID was 601-866-6090. The caller wanted to make an appointment for "Ron Fernandez" to meet with the owner. (Give me a break). He obviously knew nothing about our company -- or his! He was full of double-talk -- no substance at all to what he was telling me. I kept trying to make him give me specifics and he couldn't. The name of his company was SMS.
| Pete 2011-07-18 14:41:13 Telemarketer |
Didn't get the callback number listed above, but did get a call from 901-290-1123 like Nicole did. Same thing, trying to set up an appointment. His name was Byrne something, but these people seldom use their real names anyway. I didn't take note of the company name they represented. Probably bogus too.
| Candice 2011-01-27 20:56:47 Unknown |
We have the same problem as Nicole above! We never give message to boss. Nick gets very upset when you start asking questions. Only difference, he calls from a 601-866-6090 number and then gives the 773-712-9172 as a call back number.
| Nicole 2010-11-10 17:41:59 SMS |
I have been recienving calls from 901-290-1123, from Nick Bifigleo, Robin and Christina Stureno. They are trying to set up an appointment w the 'owner of the company', but if you tell them the owner is not interested in meeting, they are rude and persistant. Before they hang up, they will give you a call back number, 1-773-712-9172. Regardless of whether you call them back or not, (which I haven't, nor have I given any messages to my boss to call them back) they call the office multiple times a day, pushing for meetings that aren't desired. We haven't accepted a meeting of any sort, so I don't know what would happen if we did, but I'm sure it'd be obnoxious.