877-477-5335
 | beverly 2012-01-30 18:32:47 Unknown |
Incessantly calling, no messages.
| Jennifer McCoy 2011-11-02 21:24:27 Unknown |
This number keeps calling me all day. When I answer there is noone there. They even call as late as 10 pm and almost 11 pm once.
| CoralSun 2011-10-29 23:17:26 Debt Collector |
NOTE: Below my comments there's info re: formal actions taken by the Dept. of Justice against Allied Interstate, Inc.
For a couple of months, I've been receiving calls from 877-477-5335. Yes, I'm on all the DoNotCall Registry. And, no, I don't have (nor have I had) debts to any company, so there's no reason for them to call me.
However, the best I can tell, from researching this, is that these companies have purchased old debts and they are calling any phone number ever remotely associated with folks who might have had a debt, ever. (According to the Clark Howard site, if you answer their call and provide any payment info, they will actually take YOUR $$ even though you don't owe them anything.) As others have said, PLEASE do not give any caller any of your personal info.
This from the Better Business Bureau (www.bbb.org):
Government Actions
The following describes a government action that has been resolved by either a settlement or a decision by a court or administrative agency. If the matter is being appealed, it will be noted below.
As of September, 26, 2011, Consent Order #CA18607KRJ, the State of Minnesota, Department of Commerce, Commissioner of Commerce Mr. Mike Rothman, commence formal action pursuant to Minn.State. 45.027 (2010), and other applicable law, against Respondent Allied Interstate's collection agency license. The Commissioner acknowledges that on February 1, 2011, the Respondent had 1,286 registered debt collectors and had 14 collection agency locations licensed to collect in Minnesota. The Commissioner is prepared to commence formal action based on the allegations that Respondent:
A) Failed to establish adequate procedures to follow when screening individual collector applicants prior to submitting registration applications to the Commissioner which violates Minn.State 332.33, subd. 8 (2010).
B) Failed to properly screen numerous individual debt collector registration prior to submitting their initial and/or renewal registrations to the Commissioner. By submitting an unqualified applicant for a registration violates Minn.State 332.33 Subd. 5(a)(2010).
C) Employed individuals as debt collectors who were known or should have been known to, have criminal backgrounds that included felonies. Said criminal backgrounds prohibited the applicants from being registered, in violation of Minn. State. 45.027 subd. 7 (2010).
D) Failed to notify the Department when its registered debt collectors were fired for reasons that were in whole or in part violations of Minn.State. 332.385 (2010). The reasons for termination included failing background checks, 3rd party disclosure, inappropriate language and behavior, calling and swearing at debtors, theft of financial information of debtors and falsifying debtor records.
E) Employed individuals as debt collectors who were known to or should have been known to have criminal backgrounds that included felonies which is violation of Minn.Stat. 45.027 Subd. 7 (2010).
Respondent has completed the following as required in the Consent Order dated January 27, 2011:
A. Established practices, procedures and/or guidelines which include, but not limited to, a Screening Process to ensure that Respondent does not submit debt collector registration applications to the Commissioner for individuals prohibited by Minn. State 332.33 and/or otherwise known to be unqualified or unfit.
B. Submitted its Screening Process to the Commissioner for review and made such changes to the Screening Process the Commissioner deemed necessary.
C. Subjected all currently employed registered debt collectors to the Screening Process to ensure compliance with Minn.State 332.33 and reported to the Commissioner any registered collectors whose employment is terminated for not being eligible for registration.
D. Audited employee records of terminated employees for the last five years to determine if there were terminated for reasons in whole or in part for violations of Minn.Stat.332.385 (2010) and/or the FDCPA.
E. Established auditing procedures and agency policies to ensure that criminal convictions of its debt collectors are promptly reviewed and acted upon.
It is hereby ordered, pursuant to Minn.State 45.027,subd.5(2010) that Respondent shall cease and desist from any further violations of Minn.State 332 and 45.024(2010), and comply with all other laws of State of Minnesota,. Respondent shall report to the Commissioner any and all rejected debt collector registrations and the reasons for the rejections on a quarterly basis during the two year period following the effective date of this order. Respondent shall report to the Commissioner any debt collector terminations that occur as a result of their Screening Process for the renewal period June 30, 2011 through June 30, 2013.
Pursuant to Minn.State. 45.027, subd. 6(2010) that the Respondent shall pay to the State of Minnesota a civil penalty of $300,000.
For further assistance contact the State of Minnesota,
Department of Commerce,
Commissioner Mike Rothman
651-296-6025
651-297-1959 FAX
commerce.commissioner@state.mn.us
The following describes a government action that has been resolved by either a settlement or a decision by a court or administrative agency. If the matter is being appealed, it will be noted below.
As of July 19, 2010, a Settlement Agreement and Consent order (the Agreement), Case DFRFY2010025, was entered by and between the Maryland State Collection Agency Licensing Board in the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Regulation (the Agency) and Allied Interstate, Inc. (the Respondent). The Agency and the Respondent (the Parties) consent to the entry of this Agreement as a final resolution of this matter.
On February 25, 2010, after finding reasonable grounds to believe that Respondent likely violated
various provisions of the MCDCA while collecting or attempting to collect alleged consumers debts (collectively the "Alleged Violations"), and upon determining that action under BR 7-205, 7-308, FI 2-115(b).
The Respondent does not admit to the Alleged Violations set forth herein but, nonetheless, wishes to resolve the Alleged Violations without the need for an administrative hearing, thereby avoiding the costs associated with such hearing and any potential appeals, and therefore agrees to resolve this mater fully, finally, and completely without an administrative hearing as set forth in this Agreement, and further accepts without condition, and fully agrees to abide by, each and every term set forth in the Agreement.
Respondent has agreed to each and every one of the following actions in the exchange for a final resolution of this matter:
a. Respondent will pay a voluntary penalty of $20,000 by check made payable to the Commissioner of Financial Regulation within thirty (30) days of this agreement being fully executed and delivered.
b. Respondent will provide the Agency with an acceleration contact for resolution of Maryland consumer complaints filed with the Agency against Respondent, to include a non-public phone number and email address for this contact.
c. Respondent has implemented, or will implement, a program to address agent behavior problems, to include, among other things, a "red card" program, call monitoring of agents, and agent bonuses for compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
d. Respondent will complete implementation of a new compliance-focused collections software system, which was developed by a consulting firm specially for Respondent's in-house use, on or about December 31, 2010.
For further assistance contact the Maryland State Collection Agency Licensing Board in the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Regulation at 410-230-6100.
The following describes a pending government action that has been formally brought by a government agency but has not yet been resolved. We are providing a summary of the government's allegations, which have not yet been proven.
Attorney General John Kroger today announced an agreement that requires a Minnesota debt collector that has prompted hundreds of consumer complaints to pay $90,000 and put a stop to its abusive practices.
"The Department of Justice will not tolerate any attempt to threaten, harass or mislead Oregon consumers as a means of doing business." said Attorney General Kroger. "When companies violate the law, we will hold them accountable."
Roughly 200 consumer complaints have been filed with the Department of Justice against Allied Interstate in the past five years, accusing the company of systematically violating numerous prohibitions under the Oregon and federal Debt Collection Practices Acts.
Among other things, the complaints allege that Allied Interstate repeatedly called Oregon consumers even after being told they were not the intended debtor; repeatedly calling and hanging up when someone answered the phone; revealing alleged debts to third parties without permission to do so; threatening legal action the company was not authorized to take; and using obscene or profane language and harassing third parties with repeated phone calls.
Under the agreement filed April 7 in Marion County Circuit Court, Allied Interstate is permanently barred from:
Making any misrepresentation in collecting or attempting to collect a debt;
Making any representation that a consumer owes a debt or the amount of a debt, unless there is a reasonable basis for making such representation;
Communicating with or continuing to call an Oregon resident once informed that they have called the wrong number, or once a resident has stated a desire not to be contacted;
Using an automated dialer to call Oregon consumers unless the company has verified the phone numbers belong to actual debtors;
Communicating with third parties about a consumer's debt without the consumer's consent or court permission;
Using obscene or profane language or harassing consumers or third parties with repeated phone calls; and
Making any other false or misleading statement in collecting a debt, including threatening action it does not intend to take.
Allied Interstate must also pay $90,000 dollars to the Oregon Department of Justice and an additional $50,000 if it fails to abide by any terms set forth in the agreement.
Senior Assistant Attorney General Janelle Factora Wipper and Investigator Dale Geiger handled the case for the Oregon Department of Justice.
For further assistance, please contact the Minnesota Attorney General at Office of Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson
Tel: (651) 296-3353 or 1-800-657-3787
TTY: (651) 297-7206 or 1-800-366-4812
For a couple of months, I've been receiving calls from 877-477-5335. Yes, I'm on all the DoNotCall Registry. And, no, I don't have (nor have I had) debts to any company, so there's no reason for them to call me.
However, the best I can tell, from researching this, is that these companies have purchased old debts and they are calling any phone number ever remotely associated with folks who might have had a debt, ever. (According to the Clark Howard site, if you answer their call and provide any payment info, they will actually take YOUR $$ even though you don't owe them anything.) As others have said, PLEASE do not give any caller any of your personal info.
This from the Better Business Bureau (www.bbb.org):
Government Actions
The following describes a government action that has been resolved by either a settlement or a decision by a court or administrative agency. If the matter is being appealed, it will be noted below.
As of September, 26, 2011, Consent Order #CA18607KRJ, the State of Minnesota, Department of Commerce, Commissioner of Commerce Mr. Mike Rothman, commence formal action pursuant to Minn.State. 45.027 (2010), and other applicable law, against Respondent Allied Interstate's collection agency license. The Commissioner acknowledges that on February 1, 2011, the Respondent had 1,286 registered debt collectors and had 14 collection agency locations licensed to collect in Minnesota. The Commissioner is prepared to commence formal action based on the allegations that Respondent:
A) Failed to establish adequate procedures to follow when screening individual collector applicants prior to submitting registration applications to the Commissioner which violates Minn.State 332.33, subd. 8 (2010).
B) Failed to properly screen numerous individual debt collector registration prior to submitting their initial and/or renewal registrations to the Commissioner. By submitting an unqualified applicant for a registration violates Minn.State 332.33 Subd. 5(a)(2010).
C) Employed individuals as debt collectors who were known or should have been known to, have criminal backgrounds that included felonies. Said criminal backgrounds prohibited the applicants from being registered, in violation of Minn. State. 45.027 subd. 7 (2010).
D) Failed to notify the Department when its registered debt collectors were fired for reasons that were in whole or in part violations of Minn.State. 332.385 (2010). The reasons for termination included failing background checks, 3rd party disclosure, inappropriate language and behavior, calling and swearing at debtors, theft of financial information of debtors and falsifying debtor records.
E) Employed individuals as debt collectors who were known to or should have been known to have criminal backgrounds that included felonies which is violation of Minn.Stat. 45.027 Subd. 7 (2010).
Respondent has completed the following as required in the Consent Order dated January 27, 2011:
A. Established practices, procedures and/or guidelines which include, but not limited to, a Screening Process to ensure that Respondent does not submit debt collector registration applications to the Commissioner for individuals prohibited by Minn. State 332.33 and/or otherwise known to be unqualified or unfit.
B. Submitted its Screening Process to the Commissioner for review and made such changes to the Screening Process the Commissioner deemed necessary.
C. Subjected all currently employed registered debt collectors to the Screening Process to ensure compliance with Minn.State 332.33 and reported to the Commissioner any registered collectors whose employment is terminated for not being eligible for registration.
D. Audited employee records of terminated employees for the last five years to determine if there were terminated for reasons in whole or in part for violations of Minn.Stat.332.385 (2010) and/or the FDCPA.
E. Established auditing procedures and agency policies to ensure that criminal convictions of its debt collectors are promptly reviewed and acted upon.
It is hereby ordered, pursuant to Minn.State 45.027,subd.5(2010) that Respondent shall cease and desist from any further violations of Minn.State 332 and 45.024(2010), and comply with all other laws of State of Minnesota,. Respondent shall report to the Commissioner any and all rejected debt collector registrations and the reasons for the rejections on a quarterly basis during the two year period following the effective date of this order. Respondent shall report to the Commissioner any debt collector terminations that occur as a result of their Screening Process for the renewal period June 30, 2011 through June 30, 2013.
Pursuant to Minn.State. 45.027, subd. 6(2010) that the Respondent shall pay to the State of Minnesota a civil penalty of $300,000.
For further assistance contact the State of Minnesota,
Department of Commerce,
Commissioner Mike Rothman
651-296-6025
651-297-1959 FAX
commerce.commissioner@state.mn.us
The following describes a government action that has been resolved by either a settlement or a decision by a court or administrative agency. If the matter is being appealed, it will be noted below.
As of July 19, 2010, a Settlement Agreement and Consent order (the Agreement), Case DFRFY2010025, was entered by and between the Maryland State Collection Agency Licensing Board in the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Regulation (the Agency) and Allied Interstate, Inc. (the Respondent). The Agency and the Respondent (the Parties) consent to the entry of this Agreement as a final resolution of this matter.
On February 25, 2010, after finding reasonable grounds to believe that Respondent likely violated
various provisions of the MCDCA while collecting or attempting to collect alleged consumers debts (collectively the "Alleged Violations"), and upon determining that action under BR 7-205, 7-308, FI 2-115(b).
The Respondent does not admit to the Alleged Violations set forth herein but, nonetheless, wishes to resolve the Alleged Violations without the need for an administrative hearing, thereby avoiding the costs associated with such hearing and any potential appeals, and therefore agrees to resolve this mater fully, finally, and completely without an administrative hearing as set forth in this Agreement, and further accepts without condition, and fully agrees to abide by, each and every term set forth in the Agreement.
Respondent has agreed to each and every one of the following actions in the exchange for a final resolution of this matter:
a. Respondent will pay a voluntary penalty of $20,000 by check made payable to the Commissioner of Financial Regulation within thirty (30) days of this agreement being fully executed and delivered.
b. Respondent will provide the Agency with an acceleration contact for resolution of Maryland consumer complaints filed with the Agency against Respondent, to include a non-public phone number and email address for this contact.
c. Respondent has implemented, or will implement, a program to address agent behavior problems, to include, among other things, a "red card" program, call monitoring of agents, and agent bonuses for compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
d. Respondent will complete implementation of a new compliance-focused collections software system, which was developed by a consulting firm specially for Respondent's in-house use, on or about December 31, 2010.
For further assistance contact the Maryland State Collection Agency Licensing Board in the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Regulation at 410-230-6100.
The following describes a pending government action that has been formally brought by a government agency but has not yet been resolved. We are providing a summary of the government's allegations, which have not yet been proven.
Attorney General John Kroger today announced an agreement that requires a Minnesota debt collector that has prompted hundreds of consumer complaints to pay $90,000 and put a stop to its abusive practices.
"The Department of Justice will not tolerate any attempt to threaten, harass or mislead Oregon consumers as a means of doing business." said Attorney General Kroger. "When companies violate the law, we will hold them accountable."
Roughly 200 consumer complaints have been filed with the Department of Justice against Allied Interstate in the past five years, accusing the company of systematically violating numerous prohibitions under the Oregon and federal Debt Collection Practices Acts.
Among other things, the complaints allege that Allied Interstate repeatedly called Oregon consumers even after being told they were not the intended debtor; repeatedly calling and hanging up when someone answered the phone; revealing alleged debts to third parties without permission to do so; threatening legal action the company was not authorized to take; and using obscene or profane language and harassing third parties with repeated phone calls.
Under the agreement filed April 7 in Marion County Circuit Court, Allied Interstate is permanently barred from:
Making any misrepresentation in collecting or attempting to collect a debt;
Making any representation that a consumer owes a debt or the amount of a debt, unless there is a reasonable basis for making such representation;
Communicating with or continuing to call an Oregon resident once informed that they have called the wrong number, or once a resident has stated a desire not to be contacted;
Using an automated dialer to call Oregon consumers unless the company has verified the phone numbers belong to actual debtors;
Communicating with third parties about a consumer's debt without the consumer's consent or court permission;
Using obscene or profane language or harassing consumers or third parties with repeated phone calls; and
Making any other false or misleading statement in collecting a debt, including threatening action it does not intend to take.
Allied Interstate must also pay $90,000 dollars to the Oregon Department of Justice and an additional $50,000 if it fails to abide by any terms set forth in the agreement.
Senior Assistant Attorney General Janelle Factora Wipper and Investigator Dale Geiger handled the case for the Oregon Department of Justice.
For further assistance, please contact the Minnesota Attorney General at Office of Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson
Tel: (651) 296-3353 or 1-800-657-3787
TTY: (651) 297-7206 or 1-800-366-4812
| Benny 2011-10-22 02:06:57 Unknown |
I've been getting calls from them, too; almost constantly - but whenever i pick the phone just dies
| Satan 2011-10-10 15:36:19 Unknown |
These guys called at 5 am looking for my wife under her previous last name. Then again at 8 am. Then at 12. Plus the day before. And the day before.... You get the point. How do I get them blocked? Please somebody tell me which agency I file a complaint to. I worked as a telemarketer and knew if we harrassed people we would get our lines yanked.
| PHX Arizona 2011-10-05 02:42:07 Unknown |
this number keeps calling me and calling me and calling me.... When I answer, no one is there!
| LIsa 2011-09-30 12:53:52 Debt Collector |
They just called me and said they were a collections agency trying to collect on a debt. We have great credit, and no uncollected debt. I hung up on them
| Pissed in AK 2011-09-02 22:08:18 Unknown |
this number keeps calling me and calling me and calling me....
| peange 2011-09-02 21:06:32 Unknown |
stop calling me
| Carmen 2011-09-02 18:30:20 Unknown |
Won't stop calling, answered twice, first there was no one on the other side, second he said Hi how are you (Indian accent). I hung up.
| Mike 2011-09-02 17:56:46 Unknown |
any one got a web address for these jokers?
| melissa 2011-09-02 16:58:38 Unknown |
They called me 3-5 times a day and i'm at school during the day. I've looked the number up on online phone books and it says there is no such number!!
| robert 2011-09-01 22:36:33 Unknown |
have gotten a call from this numbers for a couple weeks... no one there when i answer, if i dont answer , they leave no answer.... i have started cussing at them .. but it keeps happening. when i call back .. get recoeding that the number is no longer in service.
| bob 2011-09-01 22:01:03 Unknown |
same number calls me told them to never call me again
| Norm 2011-09-01 20:46:22 Unknown |
Received several calls from this number the last couple days. Everytime I answer there is no one there and no responce, and when I don't answer, no message is left on my answering machine. When I try to call the number back all I get is a busy tone. Very strange. No idea what to do about it, but not going to bother answering it anymore.
| Kaylene 2011-09-01 18:10:40 Unknown |
Have called me 6 times int he last 24 hours. When I answer, no one is there!
| Kenneth 2011-09-01 17:19:33 Unknown |
They call then hang up, several times a day. When answered they hang up
| L. Mc 2011-09-01 17:07:40 Unknown |
Unwanted calls constantly.
| Kathy Hoanzl 2011-09-01 16:33:25 Unknown |
Seriously who the hell are these people?? Stop calling me!
| Roland Benz 2011-09-01 14:12:46 Unknown |
calling cell want leave message. Want it to stop.
| N 2011-09-01 12:55:59 Unknown |
Just got a call from 877-477-5335 number but I did not pick up. No voice message left and when I called back the call does not go through.
| Jeff 2011-09-01 02:49:37 Unknown |
Same here - some Indian trying to be cute asking for a relative. Did not specify company nor intent upon questioning - repeatedly.
| Sue Phe 2011-09-01 00:52:02 Unknown |
pick it up, no one is on the line
| chrisl 2011-08-31 21:12:47 Unknown |
Called but did not leave a message.
| me 2011-08-26 16:55:36 Unknown |
called but did not leave a message. Also have received calls from Allied Interstate from 888-297-4214.
| mydogsmom 2011-08-26 16:24:56 Unknown |
Just got another call! This is ALLIED INTERSTATE, a collection agency that has been fined a record amount by the FTC. This time it was "Schwanie". Report them at:https://www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov/FTC_Wizard.aspx?Lang=en
I am going to!
I am going to!
| mydogsmom 2011-08-26 16:18:31 Debt Collector |
Some heavily-accented Indian guy calls and asks for a person who had my phone number 4 years ago. Hard to understand his name but something like Hammand Pert. Won't identify the company name, says it's personal business (i.e. Collections). Was hoping to find out who it was so I can report them. If you have a problem with collectors calling you and you are not responsible, I have had good luck with reporting them and the calls stopping. You report them at: https://www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov/FTC_Wizard.aspx?Lang=en
© WHOSCALL.IN 2011-2024 - Privacy