888-333-3480
 | Mr Edwards 2013-06-27 06:33:47 Unknown |
WOW FOUND THIS!!
that scott got run out of las vegas before going to annaheim
=============================================
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
May 9, 2007
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Pinnacle Funds LLC
Attn: Scott Redfox
726 South Casino Center Blvd.
Suite 207
Las Vegas, NV 89101
RE: EB-07-TC-1287
Dear Mr. Scott Redfox:
This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5),
for violations of the Act and the Federal Communications Commission's
rules that govern telephone solicitations and unsolicited advertisements.
As explained below, future violations of the Act or Commission's rules in
this regard may subject you and your company to monetary forfeitures.
It has come to our attention that your company, acting under your
direction, apparently sent one or more unsolicited advertisements to
telephone facsimile machines in violation of Section 227(b)(1)(C) of the
Communications Act, as described in the attached complaint(s). Section
227(b)(1)(C) makes it "unlawful for any person within the United States,
or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the
United States . . . to use a telephone facsimile machine, computer, or
other device to send an unsolicited advertisement to a telephone facsimile
machine." As relevant here, an "unsolicited advertisement" is "any
material advertising the commercial availability or quality of any
property, goods, or services which is transmitted to any person without
that person's prior express invitation or permission." Under Commission
rules and orders in effect during the relevant period here, the Commission
considered an established business relationship between a fax sender and
recipient to constitute prior express invitation or permission to send a
facsimile advertisement. Mere distribution or publication of a fax number,
however, does not establish consent to receive advertisements by fax.
If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company violate the
Communications Act or the Commission's rules in any manner described
herein, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed
$11,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation.
You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this
letter either through (1) a personal interview at the Commission's Field
Office nearest to your place of business, (2) a written statement, or (3)
a teleconference interview with the Commission's Telecommunications
Consumers Division in Washington, DC. Your response should specify the
actions that you are taking to ensure that you do not violate the
Commission's rules governing telephone solicitation and unsolicited
advertisements, as described above.
Please contact Delores Browder at (202) 418-2861 to arrange for an
interview at the closest field office, if you wish to schedule a personal
interview. You should schedule any interview to take place within 30 days
of the date of this letter. You should send any written statement within
30 days of the date of this letter to:
Kurt A. Schroeder
Deputy Chief
Telecommunications Consumers Division
Enforcement Bureau
Federal Communications Commission
445-12th Street, S.W., Rm. 4-C222
Washington, D.C. 20554
Reference EB-07-TC-1287 when corresponding with the Commission.
Reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities are available upon
request. Include a description of the accommodation you will need
including as much detail as you can. Also include a way we can contact you
if we need more information. Please allow at least 5 days advance notice;
last minute requests will be accepted, but may be impossible to fill. Send
an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau:
For sign language interpreters, CART, and other reasonable accommodations:
202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty);
For accessible format materials (braille, large print, electronic files,
and audio
format): 202-418-0531 (voice), 202-418-7365 (tty).
Under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. S: 552(a)(e)(3), we are informing
you that the Commission's staff will use all relevant material information
before it, including information that you disclose in your interview or
written statement, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is
required to ensure your compliance with the Communications Act and the
Commission's rules.
The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment
of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or
imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. S: 1001.
Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation.
Sincerely,
Kurt A. Schroeder
Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division
Enforcement Bureau
Federal Communications Commission
Enclosures
47 U.S.C. S: 227; 47 C.F.R. S: 64.1200. A copy of these provisions is
enclosed for your convenience. Section 227 was added to the Communications
Act by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 and is most commonly
known as the TCPA. The TCPA and the Commission's parallel rules restrict a
variety of practices that are associated with telephone solicitation and
use of the telephone network to deliver unsolicited advertisements,
including fax advertising. We refer in this citation to the Commission's
rules as they existed at the time of the violations in this matter.
Revised rules in this area took effect on August 1, 2006. 47 U.S.C. S:
64.1200(a)(3); Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act of 1991 - Junk Fax Protection Act of 2005, Report and Order
and Third Order on Reconsideration, 21 FCC Rcd 3787 (2006) (2006 TCPA
Report and Order).
We have attached 1 complaint at issue in this citation. The complaint
addresses a facsimile advertisement that contains the telephone number
800-769-7190, which your business utilized during the time period at
issue.
47 U.S.C. S: 227(b)(1)(C); see also 47 C.F.R. S: 64.1200(a)(3) (providing
that no person or entity may . . . use a telephone facsimile machine,
computer, or other device to send an unsolicited advertisement to a
telephone facsimile machine). Both the TCPA and the Commission's rules
define "telephone facsimile machine" as "equipment which has the capacity
to transcribe text or images, or both, from paper into an electronic
signal and to transmit that signal over a regular telephone line, or to
transcribe text or images (or both) from an electronic signal received
over a regular telephone line onto paper." 47 U.S.C. S: 227(a)(2); 47
C.F.R. S: 64.1200(f)(8). The Commission has stated that "[t]he TCPA's
definition of `telephone facsimile machine' broadly applies to any
equipment that has the capacity to send or receive text or images." Thus,
"faxes sent to personal computers equipped with, or attached to, modems
and to computerized fax servers are subject to the TCPA's prohibition on
unsolicited faxes. . . [although] the prohibition does not extend to
facsimile messages sent as email over the Internet." Rules and Regulations
Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, Report and
Order, 18 FCC Rcd 14014, 14131-32 (2003) (2003 TCPA Report and Order).
47 U.S.C. S: 227(a)(4) (1991); 47 C.F.R. S: 64.1200(f)(10) (2003); see 47
U.S.C. S: 227 (a)(4) (2005); 47 C.F.R. S: 64.1200(f)(13) (2006) (amending
the definition of "unsolicited advertisement" to specify that prior
express invitation or permission may be "in writing or otherwise").
See Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection
Act of 1991, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 12391, 12405 (1995)
(1995 TCPA Reconsideration Order). The Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005,
Pub. L. 109-21, 119 Stat. 359 (2005), and the Commission's parallel rules,
which took effect August 1, 2006, further specify the conditions under
which an established business relationship provides an exception to the
prohibition on unsolicited fax advertising.
1995 Reconsideration Order, 10 FCC Rcd at 12408-09; see also 2003 TCPA
Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 14128 (concluding that mere publication of
a fax number in a trade publication or directory does not demonstrate
consent to receive fax advertising).
Federal Communications Commission
2
2
Federal Communications Commission
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554
that scott got run out of las vegas before going to annaheim
=============================================
Click here for Microsoft Word version
********************************************************
NOTICE
********************************************************
This document was converted from Microsoft Word.
Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.
All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.
Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.
If you need the complete document, download the
Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version.
*****************************************************************
May 9, 2007
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Pinnacle Funds LLC
Attn: Scott Redfox
726 South Casino Center Blvd.
Suite 207
Las Vegas, NV 89101
RE: EB-07-TC-1287
Dear Mr. Scott Redfox:
This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5),
for violations of the Act and the Federal Communications Commission's
rules that govern telephone solicitations and unsolicited advertisements.
As explained below, future violations of the Act or Commission's rules in
this regard may subject you and your company to monetary forfeitures.
It has come to our attention that your company, acting under your
direction, apparently sent one or more unsolicited advertisements to
telephone facsimile machines in violation of Section 227(b)(1)(C) of the
Communications Act, as described in the attached complaint(s). Section
227(b)(1)(C) makes it "unlawful for any person within the United States,
or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the
United States . . . to use a telephone facsimile machine, computer, or
other device to send an unsolicited advertisement to a telephone facsimile
machine." As relevant here, an "unsolicited advertisement" is "any
material advertising the commercial availability or quality of any
property, goods, or services which is transmitted to any person without
that person's prior express invitation or permission." Under Commission
rules and orders in effect during the relevant period here, the Commission
considered an established business relationship between a fax sender and
recipient to constitute prior express invitation or permission to send a
facsimile advertisement. Mere distribution or publication of a fax number,
however, does not establish consent to receive advertisements by fax.
If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company violate the
Communications Act or the Commission's rules in any manner described
herein, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed
$11,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation.
You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this
letter either through (1) a personal interview at the Commission's Field
Office nearest to your place of business, (2) a written statement, or (3)
a teleconference interview with the Commission's Telecommunications
Consumers Division in Washington, DC. Your response should specify the
actions that you are taking to ensure that you do not violate the
Commission's rules governing telephone solicitation and unsolicited
advertisements, as described above.
Please contact Delores Browder at (202) 418-2861 to arrange for an
interview at the closest field office, if you wish to schedule a personal
interview. You should schedule any interview to take place within 30 days
of the date of this letter. You should send any written statement within
30 days of the date of this letter to:
Kurt A. Schroeder
Deputy Chief
Telecommunications Consumers Division
Enforcement Bureau
Federal Communications Commission
445-12th Street, S.W., Rm. 4-C222
Washington, D.C. 20554
Reference EB-07-TC-1287 when corresponding with the Commission.
Reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities are available upon
request. Include a description of the accommodation you will need
including as much detail as you can. Also include a way we can contact you
if we need more information. Please allow at least 5 days advance notice;
last minute requests will be accepted, but may be impossible to fill. Send
an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau:
For sign language interpreters, CART, and other reasonable accommodations:
202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty);
For accessible format materials (braille, large print, electronic files,
and audio
format): 202-418-0531 (voice), 202-418-7365 (tty).
Under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. S: 552(a)(e)(3), we are informing
you that the Commission's staff will use all relevant material information
before it, including information that you disclose in your interview or
written statement, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is
required to ensure your compliance with the Communications Act and the
Commission's rules.
The knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment
of any material fact, in reply to this citation is punishable by fine or
imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. S: 1001.
Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation.
Sincerely,
Kurt A. Schroeder
Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division
Enforcement Bureau
Federal Communications Commission
Enclosures
47 U.S.C. S: 227; 47 C.F.R. S: 64.1200. A copy of these provisions is
enclosed for your convenience. Section 227 was added to the Communications
Act by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 and is most commonly
known as the TCPA. The TCPA and the Commission's parallel rules restrict a
variety of practices that are associated with telephone solicitation and
use of the telephone network to deliver unsolicited advertisements,
including fax advertising. We refer in this citation to the Commission's
rules as they existed at the time of the violations in this matter.
Revised rules in this area took effect on August 1, 2006. 47 U.S.C. S:
64.1200(a)(3); Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act of 1991 - Junk Fax Protection Act of 2005, Report and Order
and Third Order on Reconsideration, 21 FCC Rcd 3787 (2006) (2006 TCPA
Report and Order).
We have attached 1 complaint at issue in this citation. The complaint
addresses a facsimile advertisement that contains the telephone number
800-769-7190, which your business utilized during the time period at
issue.
47 U.S.C. S: 227(b)(1)(C); see also 47 C.F.R. S: 64.1200(a)(3) (providing
that no person or entity may . . . use a telephone facsimile machine,
computer, or other device to send an unsolicited advertisement to a
telephone facsimile machine). Both the TCPA and the Commission's rules
define "telephone facsimile machine" as "equipment which has the capacity
to transcribe text or images, or both, from paper into an electronic
signal and to transmit that signal over a regular telephone line, or to
transcribe text or images (or both) from an electronic signal received
over a regular telephone line onto paper." 47 U.S.C. S: 227(a)(2); 47
C.F.R. S: 64.1200(f)(8). The Commission has stated that "[t]he TCPA's
definition of `telephone facsimile machine' broadly applies to any
equipment that has the capacity to send or receive text or images." Thus,
"faxes sent to personal computers equipped with, or attached to, modems
and to computerized fax servers are subject to the TCPA's prohibition on
unsolicited faxes. . . [although] the prohibition does not extend to
facsimile messages sent as email over the Internet." Rules and Regulations
Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, Report and
Order, 18 FCC Rcd 14014, 14131-32 (2003) (2003 TCPA Report and Order).
47 U.S.C. S: 227(a)(4) (1991); 47 C.F.R. S: 64.1200(f)(10) (2003); see 47
U.S.C. S: 227 (a)(4) (2005); 47 C.F.R. S: 64.1200(f)(13) (2006) (amending
the definition of "unsolicited advertisement" to specify that prior
express invitation or permission may be "in writing or otherwise").
See Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection
Act of 1991, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 12391, 12405 (1995)
(1995 TCPA Reconsideration Order). The Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005,
Pub. L. 109-21, 119 Stat. 359 (2005), and the Commission's parallel rules,
which took effect August 1, 2006, further specify the conditions under
which an established business relationship provides an exception to the
prohibition on unsolicited fax advertising.
1995 Reconsideration Order, 10 FCC Rcd at 12408-09; see also 2003 TCPA
Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 14128 (concluding that mere publication of
a fax number in a trade publication or directory does not demonstrate
consent to receive fax advertising).
Federal Communications Commission
2
2
Federal Communications Commission
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554
| Mr Edwards 2013-06-27 06:06:11 Unknown |
WOW GLAD I READ ALL YOUR POSTS ABOVE
THANK YOU ON THE ADVANCE HEADS UP ON THAT SCOTT REDFUX
i am sure trouble was around the corner for me
THEY DONT CALL ANYMORE
NOW THEY USE e-mail spam and got one today 6/26/13 MR LONGO yea right
i bet he is a shortie for sure!!!! they guys lie about everything
===================================
At 09:33 AM 6/25/2013, you wrote:
Hello
I am checking in to see if you have any upcoming jobs that will require working capital.
Funding may be used for business operating expenses, inventory or equipment.
Please let me know if you have any equipment or working capital funding needs.
Thanks,
Robert Longo
Liberty Funding
130 Chaparral Court, Suite 245
Anaheim, CA 92808
888-333-3480 x 604
THANK YOU ON THE ADVANCE HEADS UP ON THAT SCOTT REDFUX
i am sure trouble was around the corner for me
THEY DONT CALL ANYMORE
NOW THEY USE e-mail spam and got one today 6/26/13 MR LONGO yea right
i bet he is a shortie for sure!!!! they guys lie about everything
===================================
At 09:33 AM 6/25/2013, you wrote:
Hello
I am checking in to see if you have any upcoming jobs that will require working capital.
Funding may be used for business operating expenses, inventory or equipment.
Please let me know if you have any equipment or working capital funding needs.
Thanks,
Robert Longo
Liberty Funding
130 Chaparral Court, Suite 245
Anaheim, CA 92808
888-333-3480 x 604
| CAP 2013-03-12 17:18:33 Telemarketer |
David at Liberty Commercial, you are a bunch of liars and thieves
| Wendy 2012-01-18 21:46:28 Unknown |
So do you mean you got the loan and then screwed him, or did they screw YOU? They have been calling us, and we do have a business and thought about getting a small loan to expand. I am doing my research before doing such. Any info would be very helpful.
Thanks
Thanks
| Alex Copeland 2011-06-06 21:05:25 Unknown |
Always answer these types of calls - they have to pay for completed call. Keep them talking as long as possible with fake info so they have to pay more.
| LE 2011-06-06 21:05:25 Unknown |
They keep calling and calling. This is not a business they are calling it is a residence. I am on the Do Not Call list but still get these stupid calls
| Stuck 2011-01-26 13:53:57 Telemarketer |
Scott Redfox. A bunch of crooks plain and simple. They use the "Evergreen Clause" look it up, to sink their "teeth" into you for way more than you asked for.
| Got screwed 2011-01-20 02:15:40 Telemarketer |
Liberty Commercial credit in Anaheim, Ca. is as crooked as they come. This operation will pad the loan with extras that will add up to thousands. This is a true story, no BS. Do not do business with Scott Redfox, the guy truly is a crook. I cannot emphasize this enough! 83W8
| anonymous 2010-09-12 05:26:59 Unknown |
Sorry for your misfortune but could you spare the time and tell us what happened please?
| Karl 2010-09-12 02:27:52 Telemarketer |
I fell for there line of B.S. Still have not had my money returned to me, do not deal with this company
| David 2009-12-22 04:28:21 Telemarketer |
To Robert Pruitt: I got one of these stupid Telemarketing calls from them again tonight. You'd think after I wasted their time last call, they would have stopped. I suggest you change the name of your company. Their behaviour has poisoned the name "Liberty Commercial Credit" and likely damage your company by name association.
| Sammy B 2009-12-16 21:15:23 Telemarketer |
I have done business with liberty commercial credit in Anaheim CA. Let me tell you, STAY AWAY. After they close the deal and SCREW you with BS charges and lock in a deal at a certain rate and payment schedule they decide to throw in an "interim rent" charge which is a way of squeezing an extra payment out of you. They then sell the loan to some other company who bought a 34 month payment from liberty. So basically I signed a 36 month contract with Liberty, Pay for 37 and then GOOD LUCK getting Aaron Gire or Scott Redfox to pick up the phone or return your call. WE GOT YOUR MONEY..... YOU GOT SCREWED HAHAHAHA
| informant 2009-12-11 15:09:00 Unknown |
These people are scammers...they bug you to death, and...then...to no suprise....they wont return calls. DO NOT FALL FOR THEIR SCHEME!!!! It is a shame that they even breath!!!
| Kellie 2009-11-18 15:51:59 Telemarketer |
We got the call tooo. They left our company a VM at 7pm...of course we were not here, and yes, we too are on the Do Not Call list...They want to give us lots of money!!! Sorry Scott, we will not be calling you back.
| Matt 2009-10-22 17:05:35 Unknown |
Has called several times and, every time, we have told him we are not interested. He continues to call, saying he is "following up" on our previous conversation (you know, the one where we asked him to STOP CALLING US!!).
Even if they are legit, the business practice of harassing people who have asked not to be contacted is enough to stay away from them.
Even if they are legit, the business practice of harassing people who have asked not to be contacted is enough to stay away from them.
| Nancy Hater 2009-10-22 10:09:26 Unknown |
I'm on the do not call list... I do not need to say 'no thank you'. They need to not call. I treat them like the scum they are, and liars like you, like the scum you are as well. Scum is scum.
This is the kind of "help" that got the economy into this crap hole!!!
Now please get a horrible disease and die painfully.
This is the kind of "help" that got the economy into this crap hole!!!
Now please get a horrible disease and die painfully.
| jetty 2009-09-22 23:13:37 Unknown |
I hang up on the stupid crap. You know because there's always a delay.
yeah that's a good way to do business.
I'd never even try it, because its rude to call people. PERIOD!
yeah that's a good way to do business.
I'd never even try it, because its rude to call people. PERIOD!
| voterbabe 2009-09-17 12:18:57 Telemarketer |
Liberty Commercial called us with this autodialed, pre-recorded "offer" a year ago; they were "more than happy" to remove us from their calling list, and now they are calling again. I agree, if you are a reputable company, then do the reputable thing when soliticing customers ~ use legal means to reach them with your reputable offer. Pay attention to the DO NOT CALL list. I can't imagine any plainer message than DO NOT CALL me, I am not interested. You're shooting yourself in the foot by ticking off potential customers with your disrespectful, dishonest tactics.
| nlk3 2009-09-04 11:51:03 Telemarketer |
Got 3 calls back to back from this telemarketer, offering working capital for your small business. Waste of time. Ignore them.
| JohnB 2009-08-13 00:25:51 Unknown |
This is a bunch of nonsense. I do website work, so I checked out their registration. This is a bogus company based in Toronto, Canada. This website has only been up for a few months. This is the info:
Administrative Contact:
contactprivacy.com, libertycommercialcredit.com@contactprivacy.com
96 Mowat Ave
Toronto, ON M6K 3M1
CA
+1.4165385457
This is all bogus and does not fit the profile of a legitimate company. I would not recommend going to this website. This could be a virus infected trap of some type.
Administrative Contact:
contactprivacy.com, libertycommercialcredit.com@contactprivacy.com
96 Mowat Ave
Toronto, ON M6K 3M1
CA
+1.4165385457
This is all bogus and does not fit the profile of a legitimate company. I would not recommend going to this website. This could be a virus infected trap of some type.
| Rob 2009-08-07 14:04:27 Unknown |
Soon when they KEPT calling me I placed my number on the Do Not Call List. I don't need some scammers calling me around 7pm trying to scam me. They keep it up, they get reported.
| Scott with Liberty Mutual 2009-08-06 00:05:04 Unknown |
I, Scott, am a complete corperate tool
| Alex Copeland 2009-07-23 03:09:18 Unknown |
Called after business hours (>7:00 pm). Called # back, no person available, asked us to leave message. Always answer these types of calls, they have to pay if call is completed, Keep them talking with fake info so they have to pay even more.
| bitherder 2009-07-21 23:43:09 Unknown |
Hogwash! You're nothing but another telespammer, interrupting those of us who have real, meaningful work to accomplish. Get a job. Quit bothering the contributors with your garbage. Thankfully there is PBXinaFlash - which has a really nifty BlackList feature. Guess what, "Scott" ? You're in my blacklist, you lucky telespammer!
| Big Mike 2009-07-14 15:52:05 Unknown |
I called them back and ask them them to remove my phone number, they were more than happy to do it.
| you know 2009-06-16 00:23:06 Telemarketer |
good thing i got the number blocked with my new Panasonic call block feature and i also filed a complaint at www.donotcall.gov
| you know 2009-06-16 00:13:34 Unknown |
just did
| JS 2009-05-21 11:44:30 Unknown |
I agree completely
| Kent 2009-05-20 14:42:33 Telemarketer |
A scam company. They are one of the worst.
| Glenn Borenstein 2009-05-04 23:14:34 Unknown |
I got the call around 7 pm. It bothers me most because it's on my business line which means I now have to be disturbed on multiple lines.
© WHOSCALL.IN 2011-2024 - Privacy